Who Wants to Grant Robots Rights?

Maartje M. A. De Graaf*, Frank A. Hindriks, Koen V. Hindriks

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The robot rights debate has thus far proceeded without any reliable data concerning the public opinion about robots and the rights they should have. We have administered an online survey (n = 439) that investigates layman’s attitudes toward granting particular rights to robots. Furthermore, we have asked them the reasons for their willingness to grant them those rights. Finally, we have administered general perceptions of robots regarding appearance, capacities, and traits. Results show that rights can be divided in sociopolitical and robot dimensions. Reasons can be distinguished along cognition and compassion dimensions. People generally have a positive view about robot interaction capacities. We found that people are more willing to grant basic robot rights such as access to energy and the right to update to robots than sociopolitical rights such as voting rights and the right to own property. Attitudes toward granting rights to robots depend on the cognitive and affective capacities people believe robots possess or will possess in the future. Our results suggest that the robot rights debate stands to benefit greatly from a common understanding of the capacity potentials of future robots.

Original languageEnglish
Article number781985
Number of pages13
JournalFrontiers in robotics and ai
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13-Jan-2022

Keywords

  • capacities
  • reasons
  • rights
  • robots
  • traits

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who Wants to Grant Robots Rights?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this