Sustainability Quotients and the Social Footprint

M.W. McElroy*, Rene J. Jorna, Jo van Engelen

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    46 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We argue that most of what passes for mainstream reporting in corporate sustainability management fails to do precisely the one thing it purports to do - which is make it possible for organizations to measure and report on the sustainability of their operations. It fails because of the lack of what the Global Reporting Initiative calls sustainability context, a shortcoming from which it, too, suffers. We suggest that this missing context calls for a new notion of sustainability ( the binary perspective), which can be conceptualized in the form of sustainability quotients. We provide specifications for such quotients in ecological and social contexts, and suggest that sustainability is best understood in terms of the impact organizations can have on the carrying capacity of non-financial capital, or what in the social case we call anthro capital. We conclude by introducing a quantitative quotients-based method for measuring and reporting on the social sustainability of an organization, the social footprint method. Copyright (C) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)223-234
    Number of pages12
    JournalCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
    Volume15
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Keywords

    • sustainability
    • measurement
    • reporting
    • social footprints
    • sustainability quotients
    • GRI
    • LIFE

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sustainability Quotients and the Social Footprint'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this