Standard versus alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy in extensive small cell lung cancer: An EORTC phase III trial

PE Postmus*, G Scagliotti, HJM Groen, F Gozzelino, JTW Burghouts, D Curran, T Sahmoud, A Kirkpatrick, G Giaccone, TAW Splinter

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Alternating chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer has been tested in several studies. Some have shown positive results that have not been confirmed in other studies. In all of the studies, however, the degree of non-cross-resistance in the regimens was questionable. The EORTC Lung Cancer Study Group developed two equipotent regimens: (i) standard (CDE)-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide; (ii) (VIMP)-vincristine, carboplatin, ifosfamide, mesna, both non-cross-resistance. These two combinations were alternated and compared with the standard chemotherapy regimen in a group of 143 patients with extensive small cell lung cancer. Median survival was 7.6 months in the standard arm and 8.7 in the alternating arm (P = 0.243). Median time to progression was 5.8 and 6.4 months, respectively (P = 0.166). Median response duration was 7.0 and 6.8 months (P = 0.221). The use of two alternating regimens with a proven degree of non-cross-resistance did not result in any improvement in survival in patients with extensive small cell lung cancer. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1498-1503
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume32A
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - Aug-1996

Keywords

  • SCLC
  • alternating chemotherapy
  • non-cross-resistance
  • MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED TRIAL
  • COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY
  • CLINICAL-TRIAL
  • ONCOLOGY-GROUP
  • CARCINOMA
  • CISPLATIN
  • CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
  • VINCRISTINE
  • DOXORUBICIN
  • ETOPOSIDE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Standard versus alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy in extensive small cell lung cancer: An EORTC phase III trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this