Small-particle Inhaled Corticosteroid as First-line or Step-up Controller Therapy in Childhood Asthma

Willem M. C. van Aalderen, Jonathan Grigg, Theresa W. Guilbert, Nicolas Roche, Elliot Israel, Richard J. Martin, Gene Colice, Dirkje S. Postma, Elizabeth V. Hillyer, Anne Burden, Victoria Thomas, Julie von Ziegenweidt, David Price*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because randomized controlled trials of established pediatric asthma therapies are expensive and difficult to perform, observational studies may fill gaps in the evidence base.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of representative small-particle inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with that of standard size-particle ICS for children initiating or stepping up ICS therapy for asthma (analysis 1) and to compare the effectiveness of ICS dose step-up using small-particle ICS with adding long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LABA) to the ICS (analysis 2).

METHODS: These historical matched cohort analyses drew on electronic medical records of children with asthma aged 5 to 11 years. Variables measured during 2 consecutive years (1 baseline year for confounder definition and 1 outcome year) included risk-domain asthma control (no hospital attendance for asthma, acute oral corticosteroids, or lower respiratory tract infection requiring antibiotics) and rate of severe exacerbations (asthma-related emergency, hospitalization, or oral corticosteroids).

RESULTS: In the initiation population (n = 797 in each cohort), children prescribed small-particle ICS versus standard sizeeparticle ICS experienced greater odds of asthma control (adjusted odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.10-2.02) and lower severe exacerbation rate (adjusted rate ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35-0.88). Step-up outcomes (n = 206 in each cohort) were also significantly better for small-particle ICS, with asthma control adjusted odds ratio of 2.22 (95% CI, 1.23-4.03) and exacerbations adjusted rate ratio of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.27-0.89). The number needed to treat with small-particle ICS to achieve 1 additional child with asthma control was 17 (95% CI, 9-107) for the initiation population and 5 (95% CI, 3-78) for the step-up population. Outcomes were not significantly different for stepped-up small-particle ICS dose versus ICS/LABA combination (n = 185 in each cohort).

CONCLUSIONS: Initiating or stepping up the ICS dose with small-particle ICS rather than with standard sizeeparticle ICS is more effective and shows similar effectiveness to add-on LABA in childhood asthma. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)721-731
Number of pages11
JournalThe Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Volume3
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Asthma
  • Childhood
  • Small-particle beclomethasone
  • Fluticasone
  • Inhaled corticosteroid
  • Long-acting beta(2)-agonist
  • Step-up therapy
  • PRACTICE RESEARCH DATABASE
  • METERED-DOSE INHALER
  • BECLOMETHASONE DIPROPIONATE
  • HFA-BECLOMETHASONE
  • EXTRAFINE AEROSOL
  • EPIDEMIOLOGY STROBE
  • PERSISTENT ASTHMA
  • CONTROLLED-TRIAL
  • LUNG DEPOSITION
  • DOUBLE-BLIND

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Small-particle Inhaled Corticosteroid as First-line or Step-up Controller Therapy in Childhood Asthma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this