Restructuring Searle's Making the Social World

Frank Hindriks*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)
156 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Institutions are normative social structures that are collectively accepted. In his book Making the Social World, John R. Searle maintains that these social structures are created and maintained by Status Function Declarations. The article's author criticizes this claim and argues, first, that Searle overestimates the role that language plays in relation to institutions and, second, that Searle's notion of a Status Function Declaration confuses more than it enlightens. The distinction is exposed between regulative and constitutive rules as being primarily a linguistic one: whereas deontic powers figure explicitly in regulative rules, they feature only implicitly in constitutive rules. Furthermore, he contends that Searle's collective acceptance account of human rights cannot adequately account for the fact that people have these rights even when they are not recognized. Finally, It is argued that a conception of collective intentionality that involves collective commitment is needed in order to do justice to the normative dimension of institutions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373-389
Number of pages17
JournalPhilosophy of the Social Sciences
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept-2013

Keywords

  • collective acceptance
  • constitutive rules
  • institutions
  • Searle
  • social ontology
  • WE-INTENTIONS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Restructuring Searle's Making the Social World'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this