TY - JOUR
T1 - Preferred outcome measures in treatments for challenging behaviour in individuals with intellectual disabilities
T2 - Results of an inclusive Delphi method
AU - de Kuijper, Gerda M.
AU - Den Besten-van Ravenswaaij, Janneke J.C.
AU - Hoekstra, Pieter J.
AU - de Bildt, Annelies
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was funded by ZonMw (Ministry of Health, Care & Sports), the Netherlands and by IFZ/Healthcare assurances, the Netherlands
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Background: Interventions for challenging behaviours in individuals with intellectual disabilities benefit from outcome monitoring that takes clients' preferences into account. We determined clients' and representatives' preferred outcome domains and measures to secure their involvement in treatment decisions for challenging behaviours. Method: We used an inclusive Delphi method. A focus group of individuals with mild intellectual disabilities and representatives of those with moderate and severe intellectual disabilities prepared the first round by assisting us in collecting possible outcomes. Panels of individuals with intellectual disabilities and representatives were composed to achieve consensus on instruments for preferred outcome domains. Results: Preferred outcome domains were behaviour, side-effects of psychotropic drugs, quality of life, daily functioning, caregiver burden and family quality of life. Corresponding outcome measures included self-report, interview and proxy-scales, including spoken versions. Conclusion: Including the preferred domains on outcomes of interventions for challenging behaviours is recommended. Research on corresponding outcome measures is necessary.
AB - Background: Interventions for challenging behaviours in individuals with intellectual disabilities benefit from outcome monitoring that takes clients' preferences into account. We determined clients' and representatives' preferred outcome domains and measures to secure their involvement in treatment decisions for challenging behaviours. Method: We used an inclusive Delphi method. A focus group of individuals with mild intellectual disabilities and representatives of those with moderate and severe intellectual disabilities prepared the first round by assisting us in collecting possible outcomes. Panels of individuals with intellectual disabilities and representatives were composed to achieve consensus on instruments for preferred outcome domains. Results: Preferred outcome domains were behaviour, side-effects of psychotropic drugs, quality of life, daily functioning, caregiver burden and family quality of life. Corresponding outcome measures included self-report, interview and proxy-scales, including spoken versions. Conclusion: Including the preferred domains on outcomes of interventions for challenging behaviours is recommended. Research on corresponding outcome measures is necessary.
KW - challenging behaviours
KW - clients' perspectives
KW - inclusive Delphi method
KW - intellectual disability
KW - outcome measures
U2 - 10.1111/jar.13067
DO - 10.1111/jar.13067
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85144229146
SN - 1360-2322
VL - 36
SP - 374
EP - 384
JO - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
JF - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
IS - 2
ER -