Performance-based pay is fair, particularly when I perform better: Differential fairness perceptions of allocators and recipients

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined in two experiments the impact of the roles that people enact (allocator or recipient) and performance attributions (talent or effort) on fairness perceptions of pay systems (performance-based pay or job-based pay). To test the relative effects of the roles that people enact, in the control conditions, participants were asked to evaluate the fairness of both allocation norms from 'behind a veil of ignorance' (Rawls, 1971). As hypothesized, the results consistently demonstrate that whereas recipients were biased in their fairness perceptions, allocators tended to be non-biased in their fairness perceptions. The self-interest bias among recipients was particularly strong when talent rather than effort attributions were imposed oil them. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)741-754
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE
  • SOCIAL DILEMMAS
  • MANAGEMENT
  • JUDGMENTS
  • SOMETIMES
  • BEHAVIOR
  • CULTURES
  • EQUITY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance-based pay is fair, particularly when I perform better: Differential fairness perceptions of allocators and recipients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this