Abstract
We examined in two experiments the impact of the roles that people enact (allocator or recipient) and performance attributions (talent or effort) on fairness perceptions of pay systems (performance-based pay or job-based pay). To test the relative effects of the roles that people enact, in the control conditions, participants were asked to evaluate the fairness of both allocation norms from 'behind a veil of ignorance' (Rawls, 1971). As hypothesized, the results consistently demonstrate that whereas recipients were biased in their fairness perceptions, allocators tended to be non-biased in their fairness perceptions. The self-interest bias among recipients was particularly strong when talent rather than effort attributions were imposed oil them. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 741-754 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | European Journal of Social Psychology |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Keywords
- DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE
- SOCIAL DILEMMAS
- MANAGEMENT
- JUDGMENTS
- SOMETIMES
- BEHAVIOR
- CULTURES
- EQUITY