Abstract
Background-In acute decompensated heart failure, guidelines recommend increasing loop diuretic dose or adding a thiazide diuretic when diuresis is inadequate. We set out to determine the adverse events associated with a diuretic strategy relying on metolazone or high-dose loop diuretics.
Methods and Results-Patients admitted to 3 hospitals using a common electronic medical record with a heart failure discharge diagnosis who received intravenous loop diuretics were studied in a propensity-adjusted analysis of all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included hyponatremia (sodium = 20% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate). Of 13 898 admissions, 1048 (7.5%) used adjuvant metolazone. Metolazone was strongly associated with hyponatremia, hypokalemia, and worsening renal function (P
Conclusions-During acute decompensated heart failure, metolazone was independently associated with hypokalemia, hyponatremia, worsening renal function and increased mortality after controlling for the propensity to receive metolazone and baseline characteristics. However, under the same experimental conditions, high-dose loop diuretics were not associated with hypokalemia, hyponatremia, or reduced survival. The current findings suggest that until randomized control trial data prove otherwise, uptitration of loop diuretics may be a preferred strategy over routine early addition of thiazide type diuretics when diuresis is inadequate.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 009149 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of the American Heart Association |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 18 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 18-Sept-2018 |
Keywords
- acute heart failure
- cardio-renal syndrome
- diuretics
- metolazone
- worsening renal function
- WORSENING RENAL-FUNCTION
- PROGNOSTIC IMPORTANCE
- SERUM CREATININE
- THERAPY
- COMBINATION
- FUROSEMIDE
- PHARMACOKINETICS
- BUMETANIDE
- RESISTANCE
- MORTALITY