General health status of Dutch elderly receiving implant-retained overdentures: A 9-year big data cross-sectional study

Mieke H Bakker*, Arjan Vissink, Gerry M Raghoebar, Anita Visser

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
152 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Very little information is available on the general health of elderly who are provided with an implant-retained overdenture (IOD).

PURPOSE: The general health status of three groups of elderly (≥75 years) were compared: those with a natural dentition (ND), those treated with an implant-retained overdenture (IOD), and those wearing a conventional denture (CD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on healthcare costs were obtained from records of Dutch health insurers that are collected by Vektis. Data on general health (chronic diseases, medication use, and polypharmacy) were acquired for elderly patients with a ND, an IOD, and a CD in 2009 and 2017. Data on the general health of elderly who received an IOD were also acquired from 2010 through 2016.

RESULTS: On average, the general health of elderly who received an IOD was comparable to general health of elderly with a ND and was better than the general health of elderly with a CD (lower prevalence of diabetes, cardiac disease, and hypertension). The general health profile of elderly receiving an IOD was consistent during all years.

CONCLUSIONS: The general health of elderly with a ND or IODs is better than those with CDs.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Volume23
Issue number2
Early online date7-Feb-2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr-2021

Keywords

  • aging
  • big data
  • cross&#8208
  • sectional study
  • dental implants
  • elderly
  • general health
  • implant&#8208
  • retained overdenture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'General health status of Dutch elderly receiving implant-retained overdentures: A 9-year big data cross-sectional study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this