TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnosis of Suspected Scaphoid Fractures
AU - Stirling, Paul H.C.
AU - Strelzow, Jason A.
AU - Doornberg, Job N.
AU - White, Timothy O.
AU - McQueen, Margaret M.
AU - Duckworth, Andrew D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 BY THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY, INCORPORATED.
PY - 2021/12/8
Y1 - 2021/12/8
N2 - »Suspected scaphoid fractures are a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge despite the advances in knowledge regarding these injuries and imaging techniques. The risks and restrictions of routine immobilization as well as the restriction of activities in a young and active population must be weighed against the risks of nonunion that are associated with a missed fracture.»The prevalence of true fractures among suspected fractures is low. This greatly reduces the statistical probability that a positive diagnostic test will correspond with a true fracture, reducing the positive predictive value of an investigation.»There is no consensus reference standard for a true fracture; therefore, alternative statistical methods for calculating sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values are required.»Clinical prediction rules that incorporate a set of demographic and clinical factors may allow stratification of secondary imaging, which, in turn, could increase the pretest probability of a scaphoid fracture and improve the diagnostic performance of the sophisticated radiographic investigations that are available.»Machine-learning-derived probability calculators may augment risk stratification and can improve through retraining, although these theoretical benefits need further prospective evaluation.»Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are a form of artificial intelligence that have demonstrated great promise in the recognition of scaphoid fractures on radiographs. However, in the more challenging diagnostic scenario of a suspected or so-called "clinical"scaphoid fracture, CNNs have not yet proven superior to a diagnosis that has been made by an experienced surgeon.
AB - »Suspected scaphoid fractures are a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge despite the advances in knowledge regarding these injuries and imaging techniques. The risks and restrictions of routine immobilization as well as the restriction of activities in a young and active population must be weighed against the risks of nonunion that are associated with a missed fracture.»The prevalence of true fractures among suspected fractures is low. This greatly reduces the statistical probability that a positive diagnostic test will correspond with a true fracture, reducing the positive predictive value of an investigation.»There is no consensus reference standard for a true fracture; therefore, alternative statistical methods for calculating sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values are required.»Clinical prediction rules that incorporate a set of demographic and clinical factors may allow stratification of secondary imaging, which, in turn, could increase the pretest probability of a scaphoid fracture and improve the diagnostic performance of the sophisticated radiographic investigations that are available.»Machine-learning-derived probability calculators may augment risk stratification and can improve through retraining, although these theoretical benefits need further prospective evaluation.»Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are a form of artificial intelligence that have demonstrated great promise in the recognition of scaphoid fractures on radiographs. However, in the more challenging diagnostic scenario of a suspected or so-called "clinical"scaphoid fracture, CNNs have not yet proven superior to a diagnosis that has been made by an experienced surgeon.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122539315&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00247
DO - 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00247
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34879033
AN - SCOPUS:85122539315
SN - 2329-9185
VL - 9
JO - JBJS reviews
JF - JBJS reviews
IS - 12
M1 - 00247
ER -