TY - JOUR
T1 - Capturing the Value of Vaccination within Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics—Practical Considerations for Expanding Valuation by Including Key Concepts
AU - Biundo, Eliana
AU - Dronova, Mariia
AU - Chicoye, Annie
AU - Cookson, Richard
AU - Devlin, Nancy
AU - Doherty, T. Mark
AU - Garcia, Stephanie
AU - Garcia-Ruiz, Antonio J.
AU - Garrison, Louis P.
AU - Nolan, Terry
AU - Postma, Maarten
AU - Salisbury, David
AU - Shah, Hiral
AU - Sheikh, Shazia
AU - Smith, Richard
AU - Toumi, Mondher
AU - Wasem, Jurgen
AU - Beck, Ekkehard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 GSK.
PY - 2024/7/15
Y1 - 2024/7/15
N2 - Following the development of a value of vaccination (VoV) framework for health technology assessment/cost-effectiveness analysis (HTA/CEA), and identification of three vaccination benefits for near-term inclusion in HTA/CEA, this final paper provides decision makers with methods and examples to consider benefits of health systems strengthening (HSS), equity, and macroeconomic gains. Expert working groups, targeted literature reviews, and case studies were used. Opportunity cost methods were applied for HSS benefits of rotavirus vaccination. Vaccination, with HSS benefits included, reduced the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) by 1.4–50.5% (to GBP 11,552–GBP 23,016) depending on alternative conditions considered. Distributional CEA was applied for health equity benefits of meningococcal vaccination. Nearly 80% of prevented cases were among the three most deprived groups. Vaccination, with equity benefits included, reduced the ICER by 22–56% (to GBP 7014–GBP 12,460), depending on equity parameters. Macroeconomic models may inform HTA deliberative processes (e.g., disease impact on the labour force and the wider economy), or macroeconomic outcomes may be assessed for individuals in CEAs (e.g., impact on non-health consumption, leisure time, and income). These case studies show how to assess broader vaccination benefits in current HTA/CEA, providing decision makers with more accurate and complete VoV assessments. More work is needed to refine inputs and methods, especially for macroeconomic gains.
AB - Following the development of a value of vaccination (VoV) framework for health technology assessment/cost-effectiveness analysis (HTA/CEA), and identification of three vaccination benefits for near-term inclusion in HTA/CEA, this final paper provides decision makers with methods and examples to consider benefits of health systems strengthening (HSS), equity, and macroeconomic gains. Expert working groups, targeted literature reviews, and case studies were used. Opportunity cost methods were applied for HSS benefits of rotavirus vaccination. Vaccination, with HSS benefits included, reduced the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) by 1.4–50.5% (to GBP 11,552–GBP 23,016) depending on alternative conditions considered. Distributional CEA was applied for health equity benefits of meningococcal vaccination. Nearly 80% of prevented cases were among the three most deprived groups. Vaccination, with equity benefits included, reduced the ICER by 22–56% (to GBP 7014–GBP 12,460), depending on equity parameters. Macroeconomic models may inform HTA deliberative processes (e.g., disease impact on the labour force and the wider economy), or macroeconomic outcomes may be assessed for individuals in CEAs (e.g., impact on non-health consumption, leisure time, and income). These case studies show how to assess broader vaccination benefits in current HTA/CEA, providing decision makers with more accurate and complete VoV assessments. More work is needed to refine inputs and methods, especially for macroeconomic gains.
KW - economic evaluation
KW - efficiency
KW - health equity
KW - health systems strengthening
KW - macroeconomic
KW - vaccination
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199525746&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/vaccines12070773
DO - 10.3390/vaccines12070773
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85199525746
SN - 2076-393X
VL - 12
JO - Vaccines
JF - Vaccines
IS - 7
M1 - 773
ER -