Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease

B Pitt*, D Waters, WV Brown, AJ van Boven, L Schwartz, LM Title, D Eisenberg, L Shurzinske, LS McCormick, Atorvastatin Versus Revascularization Treatment

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    862 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background Percutaneous coronary revascularization is widely used in improving symptoms and exercise performance in patients with ischemic heart disease and stable angina pectoris. In this study, we compared percutaneous coronary revascularization with lipid-lowerin

    Methods We studied 341 patients with stable coronary artery disease, relatively normal left ventricular function, asymptomatic or mild-to-moderate angina, and a serum level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol of at least 115 mg per deciliter (3.0 mmol per liter) who were referred for percutaneous revascularization. We randomly assigned the patients either to receive medical treatment with atorvastatin, at 80 mg per day (164 patients), or to undergo the recommended percutaneous revascularization procedure (angioplasty) followed by usual care, which could include lipid-lowering treatment (177 patients). The follow-up period was 18 months.

    Results Twenty-two (13 percent) of the patients who received aggressive lipid-lowering treatment with atorvastatin (resulting in a 46 percent reduction in the mean serum LDL cholesterol level, to 77 mg per deciliter [2.0 mmol per liter]) had ischemic events, as compared with 37 (21 percent) of the patients who underwent angioplasty (who had an 18 percent reduction in the mean serum LDL cholesterol level, to 119 mg per deciliter [3.0 mmol per liter]). The incidence of ischemic events was thus 36 percent lower in the atorvastatin group over an 18-month period (P=0.048, which was not statistically significant after adjustment for interim analyses). This reduction in events was due to a smaller number of angioplasty procedures, coronary-artery bypass operations, and hospitalizations for worsening angina. As compared with the patients who were treated with angioplasty and usual care, the patients who received atorvastatin had a significantly longer time to the first ischemic event (P=0.03).

    Conclusions In low-risk patients with stable coronary artery disease, aggressive lipid-lowering therapy is at least as effective as angioplasty and usual care in reducing the incidence of ischemic events. (N Engl J Med 1999;341:70-6.) (C) 1999, Massachusetts Medical Society.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)70-76
    Number of pages7
    JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
    Volume341
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 8-Jul-1999

    Keywords

    • MEDICAL THERAPY
    • REVASCULARIZATION
    • TRIAL

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this